Actions Concerning the Packway or Temple Lane from Leeds to Pontefract

Archive Unit

For more information, email the repository
Advice on accessing these materials
Cite this description
Bookmark:http://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb205-lc000tn/lc000tn/4/49

This material is held at
Reference
Former Reference
Dates of Creation
Physical Description

Scope and Content

Until detailed work on this great dispute has been undertaken the exact relationship of the numerous causes cannot be established; they are listed here in chronological order under the main grouping; King versus local authorities, King versus individuals, suits between party and party arising out of this.

Administrative / Biographical History

The maintenance of this highway led to a long series of actions, concerning its status as a Highway, obstructions on it, and the burden of repair. The basis of these seems to have been a feud between the Lowthers of Swillington and the Ingrams, and involved the Corporation of Leeds and the inhabitants of Temple Newsam and Whitkirk and the tenants of the respective contenders.

Archive Record|Table of contents

TEMPLE NEWSAM FAMILY AND ESTATE RECORDS (WYL100)LC000TN

ManorialLC000TN/1

Estate AdministrationLC000TN/2

Family PapersLC000TN/3

Legal papersLC000TN/4

John Grymsditch versus Thomas Cattell, William Cramby, Bartholemew Harewood and othersLC000TN/4/1

John Grimsdiche v. Francis TindallLC000TN/4/2

John Grimsditch v. William Tatham, Mayor of Pontefract, Bartholomew Whorwood, John Combe, John Ward and William Ellis.LC000TN/4/3

Sir Henry Hubbert, Bt., late Attorney General (as well for the King as for Lord Lumsden) v. Ann Countess of Arundel, William Lord Howard and Lady Elizabeth his wifeLC000TN/4/4

Actions between Ingram and WaterhouseLC000TN/4/5

Grissell Rogers, widow, versus Sir Arthur Ingram, John Allen and othersLC000TN/4/6

Sir Arthur Ingram versus Sir John Gibson and William ButcherLC000TN/4/7

Richard Price, vintner, of Westminster versus Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/8

Henry Woodde versus Edmund Earl of Mulgrave and William TurnerLC000TN/4/9

William Tennant versus Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/10

Henry Woodde versus William TurnerLC000TN/4/11

William Scudamore versus Sir Arthur Ingram the elderLC000TN/4/12

Sir Robert Heath, Attorney General versus Sir Arthur Ingram the elderLC000TN/4/13

Ambrose Beckwith of Poppleton versus Sir Arthur Ingram and William IrelandLC000TN/4/14

Theophilus, Earl of Suffolk versus Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/15

List of actions at lawLC000TN/4/16

Dame Catherine Scroope versus Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/17

Sir Arthur Ingram the Elder by John Matteson versus Thomas Makenham and othersLC000TN/4/18

Actions Concerning Newsam CommonLC000TN/4/19

Timothy Perkins and others (freeholders of Hatfield manor) versus Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/20

Joseph Waterhouse versus Sir Arthur Ingram, John Waterhouse and William MooreLC000TN/4/21

Anne Savile versus Sir Conyers DarcyLC000TN/4/22

Sir Wm. Whitmore of Apley, county of Salop, and Sir George Whitmore of London versus Sir Thomas Bland and othersLC000TN/4/23

Sir Arthur Ingram versus John GrymesdycheLC000TN/4/24

Sir Arthur Ingram versus Sir Robert BanisterLC000TN/4/25

James, Earl of Suffolk versus executors of Sir Arthur Ingram the elderLC000TN/4/26

James Earl of Suffolk, Sir Edmund Sawyer and Lawrence Whitmore, esquire versus Sir Arthur Ingram the youngerLC000TN/4/27

Christopher Ellison (on behalf of Sir Arthur Ingram) v. Marcus van Valkenburgh, Charles Waterhouse, Andrew Clarbowe, Daniel Doverley and Sir John BourchierLC000TN/4/28

Sir Arthur Ingram the younger v. Nathaniel StricksonLC000TN/4/29

Sir Thomas Hampson of Taplow, Buckinghamshire versus Sir Arthur Ingram, Elizabeth and Francis FinchLC000TN/4/30

Martha Jones versus Henry Earl of Holland, Sir Arthur Ingram and Frances FisherLC000TN/4/31

Robert Farmery versus Sir Arthur Ingram the younger and othersLC000TN/4/32

Mary Faux of Farnley, widow, versus Sir Arthur Ingram and Sir John Buck, sheriffLC000TN/4/33

Sir John Brooks versus Humphrey Wild (on behalf of Sir Arthur Ingram)LC000TN/4/34

Sir Arthur Ingram versus Francis CarliellLC000TN/4/35

Sir Arthur Ingram versus Thomas MetcalfeLC000TN/4/36

Sir Arthur Ingram versus John Trowen, Uriah Hill and nine othersLC000TN/4/37

Sir Arthur Ingram versus Richard BellwoodLC000TN/4/38

Sir Arthur Ingram v. John BailesLC000TN/4/39

Sir Arthur Ingram and Sir Hugh Bethell versus Thomas CroftLC000TN/4/40

William Mallet v. Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/41

Sir Arthur Ingram versus Thomas Northey and partner, merchantsLC000TN/4/42

Sir Arthur Ingram versus Edward SmythLC000TN/4/43

Sir Arthur Ingram versus C and J MetcalfeLC000TN/4/44

Anne Weatherhead versus Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/45

Matthew Hall versus Anthony Middleton, James Lofthouse and Anne LongleyLC000TN/4/46

Archbishop of York v. Thomas Stillington of KerfieldLC000TN/4/47

Henry Stapleton of Wighill and Anne his wife (d. of Arthur Ingram) Henry Slingsby and George Townsend v. Elizabeth Nicholls, Obadiah Nicholson and Richard WordsworthLC000TN/4/48

Actions Concerning the Packway or Temple Lane from Leeds to PontefractLC000TN/4/49

John Browne, lessee of Edward Viscount Irwin V. Sir Thomas MeeresLC000TN/4/50

Edward, Earl of Manchester and others (executors of Henry Lord Irwin and guardians of Edward, 2nd Viscount Irwin) v. William MarwoodLC000TN/4/51

William Matson versus Sir Henry Stapleton, Henry Slingsby and George Townsend (for Edward, Lord Irwin)LC000TN/4/52

Edward, Viscount Irwin (by his trustees Stapleton Slingsby and Townsend) v. Sir John Bright and othersLC000TN/4/53

Thomas Jackson, James Baynes, Thomas Gower, infant (by William Gower, his guardian) v. Ralph Stephenson, Jeromy Idle (trustees for Dame Francis Ingram) Sir Roger Langley and William IngramLC000TN/4/54

Sir Henry Stapleton, Henry Slingsby and George Townsend versus William Nicholls of Normanton and othersLC000TN/4/55

Henry Slingsby and George Townsend versus Elizabeth Nicholls (widow of William Nicholls) Obadiah Nicholson and Richard WordsworthLC000TN/4/56

James, Earl of Suffolk v. the executors of Sir Arthur IngramLC000TN/4/57

Edward, Lord Irwin infant (by Edward, Earl of Manchester) v. Henry Slingsby, George Stapleton and Brian Stapleton (executors of Henry, Lord Irwin)LC000TN/4/58

Edward, Viscount Irwin versus Matthew Hall and Richard JeffersonLC000TN/4/59

Edward Chambers versus Richard MooreLC000TN/4/60

Robert Robinson v. Robert HallLC000TN/4/61

Edward, Lord Irwin, Henry Slingsby and George Townsend versus Sir Thomas MeeresLC000TN/4/62

Trustees and guardians of Edward, Lord Irwin v. John Noell, esq., and his wife (Elizabeth widow of Edward, 2nd Viscount Irwin), Bennett, Lord Sherrard, Elizabeth, Lady Dowager Sherrard, John Taylor and Laurence CarterLC000TN/4/63

John Noell of Wallcott and Elizabeth, his wife (dowager Viscountess Irwin) versus Edward Lord Irwin, Isabella, dowager Viscountess Irwin, John Machell, Arthur Ingram, Thomas Worsley, George Townsend and John RhodesLC000TN/4/64

Nicholas Thogmorton versus Nathaniel ReadingLC000TN/4/65

Rich Ingram v. Joseph Lee, Samuel Blount and John WickerLC000TN/4/66

Arthur, Henry and George Ingram (and Charles and William Ingram, infants by) Arthur Ingram of Barrowby versus Rich, Viscount IrwinLC000TN/4/67

George Ingram versus Trustees of Edward, 4th Viscount Irwin, deceased (1716)LC000TN/4/68

Arthur, Viscount Irwin versus John Bolgie of AltoftsLC000TN/4/69

The Earl of Carlisle versus John Taylor and othersLC000TN/4/70

James de la Cruze of London, merchant, v. Arthur, 6th Viscount Irwin, Isabella dowager Viscountess and othersLC000TN/4/71

William Simpson and others (freeholders of the manor of Hatfield) v. Henry, Viscount IrwinLC000TN/4/72

Henry Fendall v. Henry, Viscount Irwin, Isabella dowager Viscountess Irwin, William Douglas and Lady Ann, his wifeLC000TN/4/73

Edward Fox, William Simpson and others versus Isabella, Lady Irwin (executrix of Arthur, Viscount Irwin)LC000TN/4/74

Henry, Lord Irwin versus Isabella, dowager Viscountess Irwin, William Ingram, Thomas Brunskill, Kendrick Shuball, Joseph Hall and Edward DickinsonLC000TN/4/75

Henry, Lord Irwin v. Dorothy Hopkinson, (widow of Robert Hopkinson, steward of Temple Newsam) and Joseph NaylorLC000TN/4/76

Dean and Chapter of Gloucester versus Lord IrwinLC000TN/4/77

Rex v. Thomas Watterton and othersLC000TN/4/78

Legal MiscellaneaLC000TN/4/79

Local AffairsLC000TN/5

Public OfficeLC000TN/6

CorrespondenceLC000TN/7

Separate EstatesLC000TN/8

Non Yorkshire EstatesLC000TN/9

Temple Newsam (additional)LC000TN/10