Baxter’s case: he was not liable for restraining Nonconformists from living in corporations

Scope and Content

Baxter’s arguments, proving that he was not liable to the penalty of the act of 17 Car. II for restraining Nonconformists from inhabiting corporations. ‘That Ri: Baxter is not lyable to the penalty of the Act of 17 Car. proved. 1˚ The Title is expository of the End & Sense of the Act which is [for restraining Nonconformists from inhabiting in Corporation’


Papers read at the Oxford Oath. See also DWL/RB/1/174; 176; 178; 226; 275.

Other Finding Aids

Argent / Black v.171 (also listed as v.41); Thomas p.12