Chalmers I. Biased touching of the editorial tiller

Archive Unit

For more information, email the repository
Advice on accessing these materials
Cite this description
Bookmark:https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb1239-627/627/1/8/8

This material is held at
Reference
Dates of Creation
Physical Description

Scope and Content

203. Chalmers I. Biased touching of the editorial tiller. Arch Dis Child 1985;60:394.

Archive Record|Table of contents

Publications and reports of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 1977-2001627

1977627/1/1

1979627/1/2

1980627/1/3

1981627/1/4

1982627/1/5

1983627/1/6

1984627/1/7

1985627/1/8

Oakley A. Social factors and pregnancy outcome627/1/8/1

Grant A, Chalmers I. Some research strategies for investigating aetiology […]627/1/8/2

Chalmers I, Sinclair JC. Promoting perinatal health627/1/8/3

Bland JM, et al. Is the clinical trial evidence about new drugs statistically adequate?627/1/8/4

Chalmers I. Proposal to outlaw the term 'negative trial'627/1/8/5

Oakley A. Consumers' attitude to obstetric care627/1/8/6

Klein M, et al. The experiences of low risk women […] in 2 systems of maternity care627/1/8/7

Chalmers I. Biased touching of the editorial tiller627/1/8/8

Garcia J, et al. Views of women […] about instrumental delivery627/1/8/9

Fawdry RDS, Mutch LMM. Antenatal history taking: what are we asking?627/1/8/10

Macfarlane AJ, Cole T. […] The effects of unemployment on mothers' and babies' health627/1/8/11

Garcia J, et al. Mothers' views of continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring627/1/8/12

Chalmers I. Enquiry into perinatal death627/1/8/13

MacDonald D, et al. The Dublin trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring627/1/8/14

Boylan P, et al. The Dublin trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring627/1/8/15

Chalmers I. Short, Black, Baird, Himsworth and social class differences […]627/1/8/16

King JF, et al. Tocolysis - the case for and against627/1/8/17

Mugford M, et al. Chorionic villus sampling627/1/8/18

Grant A. Do computers help or hinder clinical evaluation […]?627/1/8/19

Elbourne D, et al. Debendox revisited.627/1/8/20

Mugford M, et al. Standard perinatal data627/1/8/21

NPEU. Report on the Unit's work 1981-1984627/1/8/22

Macfarlane AJ. Statistics and policy making in maternity services [England and Wales]627/1/8/23

Grant A, ed. Cervical Cerclage Newsletter No.10627/1/8/24

Saunders MC, et al. The effects of hospital admission […] on the duration of twin pregnancy627/1/8/25

Chalmers I. Short, Black, Beard, Himsworth, and social class differences […]627/1/8/26

Chalmers I. Evaluation of 'unorthodox' clinical practice627/1/8/27

Collins R, et al. Antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy627/1/8/28

Mutch L, King R. Obtaining parental consent - opting in or opting out?627/1/8/29

Chalmers I. Trends and variations in the use of caesarean delivery627/1/8/30

Grant A. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women […]627/1/8/31

Macfarlane AJ. Perinatal mortality and older mothers627/1/8/32

Grant A, Elbourne D. Compliance and maternal fetal movement counting627/1/8/33

Dickersin K, et al. Comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database627/1/8/34

McPherson A, Chalmers I. Pro-conceptional care627/1/8/35

MacDonald D, et al. Is oxytocin the culprit?627/1/8/36

Mutch L, Elbourne D. Locally based perinatal surveys627/1/8/37

NPEU. A classified bibliography of controlled trials in perinatal medicine 1940-1984627/1/8/38

1986627/1/9

1987627/1/10

1988627/1/11

1989627/1/12

1990627/1/13

1991627/1/14

1992627/1/15

1993627/1/16

1994627/1/17

Annual reports627/2

Quadrennial reports627/3

Special reports627/4

Cochrane Collaboration brochures627/5

Trial papers627/6