Grant A. Do computers help or hinder clinical evaluation […]?

Archive Unit

For more information, email the repository
Advice on accessing these materials
Cite this description
Bookmark:https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb1239-627/627/1/8/19

This material is held at
Reference
Dates of Creation
Physical Description

Scope and Content

214. Grant A. Do computers help or hinder the clinical evaluation of alternative treatments in perinatal medicine? Am J Perinatal 1985;2:242-4.

Archive Record|Table of contents

Publications and reports of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 1977-2001627

1977627/1/1

1979627/1/2

1980627/1/3

1981627/1/4

1982627/1/5

1983627/1/6

1984627/1/7

1985627/1/8

Oakley A. Social factors and pregnancy outcome627/1/8/1

Grant A, Chalmers I. Some research strategies for investigating aetiology […]627/1/8/2

Chalmers I, Sinclair JC. Promoting perinatal health627/1/8/3

Bland JM, et al. Is the clinical trial evidence about new drugs statistically adequate?627/1/8/4

Chalmers I. Proposal to outlaw the term 'negative trial'627/1/8/5

Oakley A. Consumers' attitude to obstetric care627/1/8/6

Klein M, et al. The experiences of low risk women […] in 2 systems of maternity care627/1/8/7

Chalmers I. Biased touching of the editorial tiller627/1/8/8

Garcia J, et al. Views of women […] about instrumental delivery627/1/8/9

Fawdry RDS, Mutch LMM. Antenatal history taking: what are we asking?627/1/8/10

Macfarlane AJ, Cole T. […] The effects of unemployment on mothers' and babies' health627/1/8/11

Garcia J, et al. Mothers' views of continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring627/1/8/12

Chalmers I. Enquiry into perinatal death627/1/8/13

MacDonald D, et al. The Dublin trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring627/1/8/14

Boylan P, et al. The Dublin trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring627/1/8/15

Chalmers I. Short, Black, Baird, Himsworth and social class differences […]627/1/8/16

King JF, et al. Tocolysis - the case for and against627/1/8/17

Mugford M, et al. Chorionic villus sampling627/1/8/18

Grant A. Do computers help or hinder clinical evaluation […]?627/1/8/19

Elbourne D, et al. Debendox revisited.627/1/8/20

Mugford M, et al. Standard perinatal data627/1/8/21

NPEU. Report on the Unit's work 1981-1984627/1/8/22

Macfarlane AJ. Statistics and policy making in maternity services [England and Wales]627/1/8/23

Grant A, ed. Cervical Cerclage Newsletter No.10627/1/8/24

Saunders MC, et al. The effects of hospital admission […] on the duration of twin pregnancy627/1/8/25

Chalmers I. Short, Black, Beard, Himsworth, and social class differences […]627/1/8/26

Chalmers I. Evaluation of 'unorthodox' clinical practice627/1/8/27

Collins R, et al. Antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy627/1/8/28

Mutch L, King R. Obtaining parental consent - opting in or opting out?627/1/8/29

Chalmers I. Trends and variations in the use of caesarean delivery627/1/8/30

Grant A. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women […]627/1/8/31

Macfarlane AJ. Perinatal mortality and older mothers627/1/8/32

Grant A, Elbourne D. Compliance and maternal fetal movement counting627/1/8/33

Dickersin K, et al. Comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database627/1/8/34

McPherson A, Chalmers I. Pro-conceptional care627/1/8/35

MacDonald D, et al. Is oxytocin the culprit?627/1/8/36

Mutch L, Elbourne D. Locally based perinatal surveys627/1/8/37

NPEU. A classified bibliography of controlled trials in perinatal medicine 1940-1984627/1/8/38

1986627/1/9

1987627/1/10

1988627/1/11

1989627/1/12

1990627/1/13

1991627/1/14

1992627/1/15

1993627/1/16

1994627/1/17

Annual reports627/2

Quadrennial reports627/3

Special reports627/4

Cochrane Collaboration brochures627/5

Trial papers627/6