Oakley A. The division of labour by gender

Archive Unit

For more information, email the repository
Advice on accessing these materials
Cite this description
Bookmark:http://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb1239-627/627/1/4/25

This material is held at
Reference
Dates of Creation
Physical Description

Scope and Content

90. Oakley A. The division of labour by gender. Unit for Course E200 Contemporary Issues in Education. Open University, 1981. This book is not available as a photocopy, but is available in the Arts and Social Studies library: see http://librarysearch.cf.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/dlDisplay.do?docId=CARDIFF_LMS75398

Archive Record|Table of contents

Publications and reports of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 1977-2001627

1977627/1/1

1979627/1/2

1980627/1/3

1981627/1/4

Grant A, Chalmers I. Register of controlled trials in perinatal medicine627/1/4/1

Oakley A. Adjustment of women to motherhood627/1/4/2

Oakley A, Chamberlain GVP. Medical and social factors in postpartum depression627/1/4/3

Oakley A. Mothers and children in society627/1/4/4

Macfarlane AJ. The derivation and uses of perinatal and neonatal mortality rates627/1/4/5

Papiernik E, et al. Collaborative trials in perinatal medicine627/1/4/6

Macfarlane AJ, Chalmers I. Problems in the interpretation of perinatal mortality statistics627/1/4/7

Oakley A. Prologue: reflections on the study of household labor627/1/4/8

Graham H, Oakley A. Competing ideologies of reproduction627/1/4/9

Newcombe RG, Chalmers I. Assessing the risk of preterm labour627/1/4/10

Macfarlane AJ. Birth, death and handicap: saving money, spending lives627/1/4/11

Grant A. Do fetal movements reflect fetal wellbeing627/1/4/12

Oakley A. Subject women627/1/4/13

Hare EH, et al. The changing seasonality of infant deaths […]627/1/4/14

Chalmers I, Mutch L. Are current trends in perinatal practice associated with […] handicapping conditions?627/1/4/15

Oakley A. The relevance of the history of medicine to an understanding of current change627/1/4/16

Garcia J, Enkin MW. Editorial: a day with Michel Odent627/1/4/17

Chalmers I, Adelstein AM. Improving the quality of perinatal statistics627/1/4/18

Garcia J. Feeling special or just a number?627/1/4/19

Dennis J, Chalmers I. Very early neonatal seizure rate627/1/4/20

Brown I, et al. Standard national perinatal data: a suggested minimum data set.627/1/4/21

Garcia J. What women want - a flexible service627/1/4/22

Oakley A. Normal motherhood: an exercise in self control?627/1/4/23

Oakley A. Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms?627/1/4/24

Oakley A. The division of labour by gender627/1/4/25

Oakley A. Mothers and children in society627/1/4/26

Chalmers I. Evaluation of perinatal practice: the limitations of audit by death627/1/4/27

Grant AM, Grant F. NPEU/WHO Register of controlled trials in perinatal medicine627/1/4/28

Elbourne D. Is the baby all right?627/1/4/29

Elbourne D, Mutch L. Archive of locally based perinatal surveys627/1/4/30

Grant A, ed. Cervical Cerclage Trial Newsletter No.1.627/1/4/31

Elbourne D. Aberdeen/Cardiff/Oxford collaborative project627/1/4/32

1982627/1/5

1983627/1/6

1984627/1/7

1985627/1/8

1986627/1/9

1987627/1/10

1988627/1/11

1989627/1/12

1990627/1/13

1991627/1/14

1992627/1/15

1993627/1/16

1994627/1/17

Annual reports627/2

Quadrennial reports627/3

Special reports627/4

Cochrane Collaboration brochures627/5

Trial papers627/6