Mugford M. […] Reported differences in definitions of vital events and statistics I.

Archive Unit

For more information, email the repository
Advice on accessing these materials
Cite this description
Bookmark:http://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb1239-627/627/1/9/28

This material is held at
Reference
Dates of Creation
Physical Description

Scope and Content

259. Mugford M. A comparison of reported differences in definitions of vital events and statistics I. In: Phaff JML, ed. Perinatal health services in Europe. London: Croom Helm, 1986:143-59.

Archive Record|Table of contents

Publications and reports of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 1977-2001627

1977627/1/1

1979627/1/2

1980627/1/3

1981627/1/4

1982627/1/5

1983627/1/6

1984627/1/7

1985627/1/8

1986627/1/9

Macfarlane AJ. Trends in maternity care627/1/9/1

Grant A. Portsmouth operative delivery trial627/1/9/2

Mutch L. Early developmental therapy627/1/9/3

Mugford M, Stilwell J. Maternity services627/1/9/4

Whitelaw A, Grant A. Post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation in infants627/1/9/5

Macfarlane AJ, Mugford M. An epidemic of caesareans?627/1/9/6

Grant A, Garcia J, Macdonald D. Fetal monitoring in labour627/1/9/7

Macfarlane AJ. Anaesthetics - the risk for black women627/1/9/8

Elbourne D, Mutch L. Debendox627/1/9/9

Carmody F, et al. Vacuum extraction: a randomized controlled comparison […]627/1/9/10

Johnson A. Screening tests for hearing and visual impairment627/1/9/11

Macfarlane AJ. Problems in using medical statistics627/1/9/12

Grant A. Controlled trials of routine ultrasound in pregnancy627/1/9/13

Chalmers I. Medicine and the media627/1/9/14

Grant A. Commentary: Repair of episiotomies and perineal tears627/1/9/15

Spencer J, et al. A randomized comparison of [catgut] for the repair of perineal trauma627/1/9/16

Mutch L. Archive of locally based perinatal surveys627/1/9/17

Murphy K, et al. Maternal considerations in the use of pelvic examinations in labour627/1/9/18

Grant A, et al. Multicentre fetal movements trial627/1/9/19

Oxford Region Child Development Project. Annual Report627/1/9/20

Grant A. The Dublin […] trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring627/1/9/21

Elbourne D, Lovell A. Patients' access to records627/1/9/22

Macfarlane AJ, Mugford M. An epidemic of caesareans?627/1/9/23

Campbell R, Macfarlane AJ. Place of delivery: a review627/1/9/24

Mutch LMM. Secular changes in two-year survival and rehospitalisation rates […]627/1/9/25

Chalmers I. Electronic publications for updating controlled trial reviews627/1/9/26

Oakley A. Social support and perinatal outcome627/1/9/27

Mugford M. […] Reported differences in definitions of vital events and statistics I.627/1/9/28

Mutch L, et al. Secular changes in rehospitalization of very low birthweight infants627/1/9/29

Garcia J, et al. Midwives confined? Labour ward policies and routines627/1/9/30

Proud J, Grant A. The evaluation of ultrasonographic placental grading […]627/1/9/31

Chalmers I. A register of controlled trials in perinatal medicine627/1/9/32

Evans P, et al. […] The standardisation of the recording and reporting of cerebral palsy627/1/9/33

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit. Annual Report627/1/9/34

Macfarlane AJ. Whatever happened to the Black report?627/1/9/35

Grant A. Randomised trial of preterm breech delivery627/1/9/36

Mutch L. Epidemiology: perinatal mortality and morbidity627/1/9/37

Elbourne D, et al. Perinatal outcomes and related factors627/1/9/38

Chalmers I. Minimizing harm and maximizing benefit […]627/1/9/39

Chalmers I. Problemi legali nella practica ostetrica627/1/9/40

Macfarlane Alison, et al. Comparisons of data from regional perinatal mortality surveys627/1/9/41

Chalmers I. British MRC randomized trials involving international collaboration627/1/9/42

Andrews J, et al. The Cardiff Births Survey627/1/9/43

Mugford M, et al. Treatment of umbilical cords: a randomised trial […]627/1/9/44

Chalmers I, et al. The Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials […]627/1/9/45

Carmody F, et al. Follow-up of babies delivered [by] vacuum extraction and forceps627/1/9/46

Chalmers I. Editors, peers and the process of scientific review627/1/9/47

Chalmers I. The need for collaborative clinical trials in obstetrics and gynaecology627/1/9/48

Grant A. Cervical cerclage: evaluation studies627/1/9/49

Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, et al. Working conditions of pregnant women and preterm birth627/1/9/50

Garcia J, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ. Legal measures for […] maternal and child health627/1/9/51

Oakley A, Chalmers I, Elbourne D. The effects of social interventions in pregnancy627/1/9/52

Chalmers I. Discussion [prevention of preterm birth]627/1/9/53

Elbourne D, Mutch L. Postal surveys of general practitioners627/1/9/54

Chalmers I, et al. Comparison of Chorion Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis […]627/1/9/55

1987627/1/10

1988627/1/11

1989627/1/12

1990627/1/13

1991627/1/14

1992627/1/15

1993627/1/16

1994627/1/17

Annual reports627/2

Quadrennial reports627/3

Special reports627/4

Cochrane Collaboration brochures627/5

Trial papers627/6